PROSES EVALUASI DAN PENILAIAN PESERTA DIDIK ABAD 21
Abstract
Evaluasi dan penilaian abad ke-21 merupakan proses sistematis untuk mengumpulkan, menganalisis, dan menginterpretasikan informasi mengenai pencapaian kompetensi peserta didik secara menyeluruh. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian studi kepustakaan (Library Research) guna mendapatkan data valid dari evaluasi dan penilaian abad 21. Hasil dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Konsep evaluasi dan penilaian abad 21 meliputi: a) penilaian outentik dan b) penilaian formatif dan sumatif. 2) Model dan pendekatan penilaian abad 21 meliputi: a) Assessment for Learning, b) Performance Assessment, c) Portofolio Penilaian, d) Penilaian HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). 3) Abad 21 ditandai oleh penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan efisiensi penilaian. E-assessment memanfaatkan aplikasi digital untuk pemberian soal, penilaian otomatis, dan analisis data siswa.
Downloads
References
Chaniago, N. S., Nasution, P. A. K., & Fahmi, F. (2021). RETORIKA KETERAMPILAN DASAR MENGAJAR GURU DI SEKOLAH. Hijri. https://doi.org/10.30821/hijri.v10i1.11354
Creswel, J. W. (2023). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research Design.
Davis, J. (2009). The effect of using portfolios on student-parent and parent-teacher communication. Eighth Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference.
Eber, P. a, & Parker, T. S. (2007). Assessing Student Learning : Applying Bloom ’ s Taxonomy Bloom ’ s Taxonomy. Human Service Education.
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Goldsmith, L. (2014). Digital feedback: an integral part of the online classroom. Distance Learning.
Hirawati, Fahmi, F., Sinaga, R. L., & Nisa, K. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dalam Pembinaan Akhlak Siswa Di Man 2 Model Medan. Ar-Raudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan.
Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of bloom’s taxonomy. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433562
Limbong, M., Frimansyah, Fahmi, F., & Khairiah, R. (2022). Sumber Belajar Berbasis Media Pembelajaran Interaktif di Sekolah. Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi. DECODE: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi.
N. Hopfenbeck, T. (2018). Classroom assessment, pedagogy and learning–twenty years after Black and Wiliam 1998. In Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1553695
Siemens, G. (2019). Learning analytics and open, flexible, and distance learning. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1656153
Stiggins, R. (2005). Assessment for learning: Building a culture of confident learners. In On common ground: The power of professional learning communities.
Taglietti, D., Grimaldi, E., & Serpieri, R. (2018). The good school/the bad head teacher: Neo-managerialism and the re-making of the head teacher. In International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research, and Critiques. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150222
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills_ Learning for Life in Our Times -Jossey-Bass (2009). Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). What Educational Purposes Should the school seek to attain? Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. In Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226820323.001.0001
Copyright (c) 2026 Ar-raudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
