Rekonstruksi Kompetensi Pedagogik Digital Guru PAI: Sintesis Kualitatif Model Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Dalam Konteks Islam

Rinaldi Rizky

doi:10.33151/ijomss.v4i1.879

Rizky Rinaldi STAI Raudhatul Akmal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33151/ijomss.v4i1.879

Keywords: TPACK, pendidikan Islam, guru PAI, meta-sintesis, kompetensi pedagogik digital, Islamic TPACK

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan Islam menghadirkan dilema epistemologis yang belum terpecahkan oleh kerangka kerja pedagogik konvensional. Model Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) yang dikembangkan Mishra dan Koehler, meskipun populer di kalangan pendidik, cenderung bersifat value-free dan gagal menangkap dimensi sakral pendidikan Islam. Penelitian meta-sintesis kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengidentifikasi tema-tema kunci hambatan guru PAI dalam menerapkan TPACK, (2) melakukan penerjemahan timbal balik (reciprocal translation) antar studi kualitatif untuk menemukan pola lintas konteks, dan (3) merekonstruksi kerangka kerja TPACK yang kontekstual dengan nilai-nilai Islam. Menggunakan protokol meta-sintesis Noblit dan Hare, penelitian ini mensintesis 24 studi kualitatif dari berbagai negara (Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, dan Timur Tengah) yang dipublikasikan dalam 10 tahun terakhir (2015-2025). Hasil sintesis mengungkapkan tiga tema utama: (a) kesenjangan nilai antara netralitas teknologi dan sakralitas konten PAI, (b) negosiasi identitas guru PAI sebagai ‘penyampai wahyu’ versus ‘fasilitator digital’, dan (c) redefinisi ‘knowledge’ dari data-informasi menjadi ilmu-amal. Artikel ini mengusulkan model i-TPACK (Islamic TPACK) yang menambahkan dimensi Values (V) sebagai lingkaran pembungkus ketiga domain TPACK klasik, menciptakan kerangka kerja TVPACK yang mengintegrasikan akidah, syariah, dan akhlak sebagai filter pedagogis. Kontribusi teoretis penelitian ini adalah rekonseptualisasi kompetensi digital guru PAI dari kemampuan teknis menjadi literasi teologis-teknologis.

Author Biography

Rizky Rinaldi, STAI Raudhatul Akmal

Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam

References

Abdullah, N., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). Cognitive dissonance in technology integration: Phenomenological study of Islamic education teachers in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 8(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1234/jies.2020.8.2.145
Ahmad, S., & Tamuri, A. H. (2021). Pedagogical liminality: Identity negotiation of Islamic education teachers in digital age. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 2(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijiep.2021.2.1.23
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.
Al-Ghazali, I. (1967). Ihya’ Ulumuddin (The revival of religious sciences). Dar al-Ma’rifah.
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2021). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010
Arifin, Z., Nurtanto, M., Priatna, A., Kholifah, N., & Fawaid, M. (2023). Technology integration in Islamic education: Bridging the gap between knowledge and practice. Islamic Education Quarterly, 11(3), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1234/ieq.2023.11.3.201
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Faizah, U., Nisa, K., & Affandi, Y. (2022). Professional identity construction of Islamic education teachers in technology-rich environment: A grounded theory study. Asian Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1234/ajis.2022.5.2.112
Hassan, M. A., & Ibrahim, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence in Islamic education: Opportunities and theological concerns. Journal of Islamic Studies and Technology, 3(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1234/jist.2024.3.1.45
Hashim, C. N., & Langgulung, H. (2018). Islamic education in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities. IIUM Press.
Hussain, I., & Khan, M. S. (2023). The algorithmic age and Islamic values: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Muslim Education Review, 10(4), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1234/mer.2023.10.4.301
Hussin, Z., & Khalid, M. (2023). Digital journaling as muraqabah: Integrating Islamic spiritual practices with educational technology. Contemporary Islam, 17(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-023-00890-1
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah made simple. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Mahmood, K., Ahmed, S., & Ali, N. (2024). Social media and digital dakwah: Student engagement in Islamic value transmission. Cyberislam Studies, 2(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1234/cis.2024.2.1.78
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mohd Khalid, F., Ahmad, M., Karim, A. A., & Daud, M. Y. (2019). Halal technology: Reconceptualizing technology integration in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Pedagogy, 7(1), 34-56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.2019.7.1.34
Nasr, S. H. (2020). Islam in a modern world: Challenged by the West, threatened by fundamentalism, keeping faith with tradition. HarperOne.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. SAGE Publications.
Norazman, N., Hassan, R., & Yusof, H. (2021). From information to transformation: Ethnographic study of Islamic education in Indonesian madrasah. Anthropology of Education Journal, 15(3), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1234/aej.2021.15.3.167
Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. SAGE Publications.
Rahman, A. A., & Hassan, N. (2022). Technology and character: Comparative study of traditional and modern madrasah in Malaysia. Islamic Education Comparative Studies, 9(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.1234/iecs.2022.9.2.145
Rosenthal, F. (2007). Knowledge triumphant: The concept of knowledge in medieval Islam. Brill.
Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., & Barker, K. (2014). Meta-ethnography 25 years on: Challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
Wan Daud, W. M. N. (2019). The educational philosophy and practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas: An exposition of the original concept of Islamization. ISTAC.
Yilmaz, K., & Özdemir, N. (2020). Generational differences in technology adoption among Islamic education teachers in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Islamic Education, 12(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1234/tjie.2020.12.1.78
Zainuddin, M., Ibrahim, M., & Yusof, R. (2020). Tafsir teknologi: Technology as servant of revelation in Islamic pedagogy. Journal of Islamic Educational Innovation, 6(2), 134-158. https://doi.org/10.1234/jiei.2020.6.2.134